On going debates revolving around college athletics have
recently gone to a new level: the issue of unionizing. Marc Edelman, with the
use of a list and statistics, argues that college athletes should indeed be
allowed to get paid and unionize.
Edelman
utilizes a list in order to make his argument clear, concise, and logical. To
the reader, whom would be an ordinary sports fan or participant, an extensive
essay wouldn’t be worth sitting down to read. In an ordinarily formatted essay,
one can only make so many arguments without convoluting the purpose, making the
essay too long, or losing the interest of sports fans simply searching for
quick information. A list effectively is able to concisely make its points in a
logical manner that, in this case, effectively communicates to the audience.
Within this
list, Edelman utilizes statistics in order to make a logical argument. For
example, Edelman states that, “The
typical Division I college football player devotes 43.3 hours per week
to his sport- 3.3 more hours than the typical American work week.” With
the use of specific facts and statistics, Edelman is able to prove to his
audience that logically, a college athlete should be treated as employees by
their respective schools. Edelman not only implements statistics about the
physical labor, but about the revenue as well.
For example, he tells his readers that, “The NCAA currently produces nearly $11 Billion in annual revenue from college sport— more than…total league revenues of both the National Basketball
Association and the National Hockey League.” By using a variety of specific
statistics, Edelman is able to successfully create a logical argument.
With the use of a list and
statistics, Marc Edelman is successfully able to prove his argument that
college athletes should indeed be able to unionize and receive pay.
No comments:
Post a Comment